- Explained — N (Refusal of Placement Order) 2023-04-05
“…“I believe the judgment sufficiently explains my reasoning and does not require elaboration pursuant to the principles in English v Emery Reimbold & Strick Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 605.…”
- Cited — Re C & Ors (Care Proceedings: Adequacy of Reasons) 2023-03-30
“…[2002] EWCA Civ 605, [2002] 1 WLR 2409 and first adopted in family cases in…”
- Explained — Quantum Care Limited & Anor. v Lalit Modi 2023-02-21
“…ase that “every factor which weighed with the judge in his appraisal of the evidence has to be identified and explained” (English v Emery Reimbold & Strick Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 605, [2002] 1 WLR 2409, at paragraph 20, per Lord Phillips, giving the judgment of the Court). Seventhly, the Judge can, I think, be seen to have gone too far in p…”
- Cited — F and G (Children) (Sexual Abuse Allegations) 2022-07-25
“…[2002] EWCA Civ 605. In the family law jurisdiction, the two key authorities are…”
- Cited — B (A Child) (Adequacy of Reasons) 2022-03-25
“…position and the judge’s reasons for discounting it, if that is the position. The point is put shortly at paragraph 16 of English v Emery Reimbold & Strick Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 605:…”
- Considered — Kaitey (R on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2021-12-10
“…ge an opportunity to consider setting out fuller reasons in relation to this argument, in accordance with English v Emery Reimbold & Strick Ltd (Practice Note) [2002] EWCA Civ 605; [2002] 1 WLR 2409. In any event, he submits, the Judge did in substance address the point: she repeatedly cited Khadir, including, at para. 27, the precise pr…”
- Doubted — All Answers Ltd v W & Anor 2021-04-30
“…complied with the requirements set out in the judgment in Meek v City of Birmingham District Council [1987] IRLR 250 and English v Emery Reimbold & Strick Ltd. [2002] EWCA Civ 605, [2002] 1 WLR 2409) and the EAT did not have doubts as to the adequacy of the employment tribunal’s reasoning;…”
- Cited — Cuciurean v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor 2021-03-16
“…ere the complaint, the right course would have been to ask the Judge for further reasons and/or to appeal on that ground: English v Emery Reimbold & Strick Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 605 [2002] 1 WLR 2409. That has not been done.…”
- Followed — O (A Child : Judgment: Adequacy Of Reasons) 2021-02-16
“…ufficiency of the reasons and that his remedy in those circumstances, following the approach prescribed by this Court in English v EmeryReimbold and Strick Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 605 and in subsequent family cases including Re B [2003] 2 FLR 1035 and Re A and L [2011] EWCA Civ 1205, reported as Re A and another (Children) (Judgment: Adequac…”
- Cited — W (A Child) (Rev 2) 2019-11-18
“…[2002] EWCA Civ 605…”
- Cited — OH (Algeria) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2019-10-24
“…ve led him to his decision. They need not be elaborate … there is no duty … to deal with every argument presented…” See English v Emery Reimbold and Strick Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 605 [2002] 1 WLR 2409. The FtT did so.…”
- Applied — E (Children: Reopening Findings of Fact) 2019-08-14
“… could not invariably be the cut-off point. If a judge is asked, in accordance with the guidance given in English v Emery Reimbold & Strick Ltd (Practice Note) [2002] EWCA Civ 605 [2002] 1 WLR 2409, as applied to family cases in In re A [2012] 1 WLR 595, to elaborate his reasoning and in doing so realises that his original decision was w…”
- Cited — Simetra Global Assets Ltd & Anor v Ikon Finance Ltd & Ors 2019-08-09
“…This approach was affirmed in English v Emery Reimbold & Strick Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 605, [2002] 1 WLR 2409, where it was held that English common law on this issue was consistent with the requirements of Article 6 of the European Convention on Hum…”
- Cited — I (Children) 2019-05-24
“…English v Emery Reimbold and Strick Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 605. The Master of the Rolls, Lord Phillips, said:…”
- Cited — Staechelin & Ors v ACLBDD Holdings Ltd & Ors 2019-05-14
“…at any length with matters that are not disputed. It is sufficient if what he says shows the basis on which he has acted: English v Emery Reimbold & Strick Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 605, [2002] 1 WLR 2409; Fage at [115]. Where there is a conflict of fact between witnesses, it may be enough for the judge to say that one witness was preferred to…”
- Cited — London Borough of Lambeth v Agoreyo 2019-03-05
“… a judgment which does not set out the reasons for a determination in relation to key issues is fundamentally flawed: see English v Emery Reimbold & Strick Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 605; [2002] 1 WLR 2409, at para. 19 (Lord Phillips MR, with whom Latham and Arden LJJ agreed). However, at the hearing before us, Mr Allen made clear that this is …”
- Cited — AS (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2019-02-21
“…to ask the Upper Tribunal the relevant question under the procedure endorsed by this Court, as regards appeals from the High Court, in English v Emery Reimbold [2002] EWCA Civ 605, [2002] 1 WLR 2409, and again in the context of appeals from an employment tribunal in Barke v Seetec Business Technology Centre Ltd [2005] EWCA Civ 578, [2005…”
- Cited — P (A Child) 2018-04-11
“…ing for each of the parties were complying precisely with the process originally described by this court in the case of English v Emery Reimbold and Strick Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 605 and subsequently endorsed in the family law context by this court on many occasions.…”
- Explained — Canal & River Trust v Thames Water Utilities Ltd 2018-03-02
“…o Thames, as Ms Abram accepted, to ask the judge to expand on her reasoning if this was to be made a plank of the appeal: see English v Emery Reimbold & Strick [2002] EWCA Civ 605 at [22] to [25]. In that case Lord Philips MR (giving the judgment of the court which included Latham and Arden LJJ) also explained:…”
- Cited — VC, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department (Rev 1) 2018-02-02
“…[2002] EWCA Civ. 605, [2002] 1 WLR 2409. These failures made our…”