How many times has [2007] EWCA Civ 1108 been cited?

[2007] EWCA Civ 1108 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2007] EWCA Civ 1108

· cited by 3 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Considered · 2Explained · 1

Considered — Nadia Zaman v London Borough Of Waltham Forest 2023-03-24
“…s as they are known to be at the date of the review, the accommodation previously offered would now be considered suitable” (Osseily v Westminster City Council [2007] EWCA Civ 1108, [2008] HLR, at paragraph 13, per Laws LJ). That means that a reviewer “is entitled to have regard to facts discovered since the original decision, but they mu…”
Explained — Shamso Abdikadir v London Borough of Ealing 2022-07-15
“…In Osseily v Westminster City Council [2007] EWCA Civ 1108, [2018] HLR 18 Laws LJ explained at [11]…”
Considered — London Borough of Bromley v Broderick 2020-11-16
“…s as they are known to be at the date of the review, the accommodation previously offered would now be considered suitable” (Osseily v Westminster City Council [2007] EWCA Civ 1108,…”