How many times has [2008] EWCA Civ 421 been cited?

[2008] EWCA Civ 421 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2008] EWCA Civ 421

· cited by 3 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2008] EWCA Civ 421

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3

Cited — Nadia Zaman v London Borough Of Waltham Forest 2023-03-24
“…t they may discover what facts existed as at that date, between the date of that original decision and the date of the review” (Omar v Westminster City Council [2008] EWCA Civ 421, [2008] HLR 36, at paragraphs 30 and 32, per Waller LJ).…”
Cited — Shamso Abdikadir v London Borough of Ealing 2022-07-15
“…In addition, as Waller LJ said in Omar v Westminster City Council [2008] EWCA Civ 421, [2008] HLR 36 at [32]:…”
Cited — London Borough of Bromley v Broderick 2020-11-16
“…t they may discover what facts existed as at that date, between the date of that original decision and the date of the review” (Omar v Westminster City Council [2008] EWCA Civ 421, [2008] HLR 36, at paragraphs 30 and 32).…”