- Considered — AL (Albania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-05-24
“…part, but only in part, there is often much to be said for concluding that there is no order for costs. That I think was the approach adopted in the Scott case [2009] EWCA Civ 217. However, where there is not a clear winner, so much would depend on the particular facts. In some such cases it may help to consider who would have won if the…”
- Cited — ZN (Afghanistan) & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-05-11
“…for costs. The need for such analysis for this reason has been urged by the Court of Appeal in R (on the application of Scott) v Hackney London Borough Council [2009] EWCA Civ 217, para. 38, and R (on the application of Bahta) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 895; [2011] 5 Costs LR 857, at paras. 61-62 and 66-…”
- Cited — RL & Ors v The London Borough of Croydon 2018-04-11
“…elevant factor, adherence to the Pre-Action Protocol for Judicial Review which had been introduced in December 2001: R (Scott) v Hackney London Borough Council [2009] EWCA Civ 217. In that case Hallett LJ said (para 51):…”
- Considered — SM (Afghanistan) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-01-24
“…part, but only in part, there is often much to be said for concluding that there is no order for costs. That I think was the approach adopted in the Scott case [2009] EWCA Civ 217. However, where there is not a clear winner, so much would depend on the particular facts. In some such cases it may help to consider who would have won if the…”