- Cited — Tradition Financial Services Ltd v Bilta (UK) Ltd & Ors 2023-02-10
“…In R (M) v Croydon LBC [2012] EWCA Civ 595, [2012] 1 WLR 2607 Lord Neuberger MR differentiated between cases where the claimant had achieved all the relief that he sought, and cases in which the claimant had achieved part…”
- Applied — THE KING on the application of MH (ERITREA) v SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT 2022-10-10
“…cases is what approach the Court should take to the underlying merits of the claim. The leading case is M v Croydon London Borough Council [2012] EWCA Civ 595; [2012] 1 WLR 2607. In that case, Lord Neuberger first considered the position in private law litigation. He then applied those principles to applications for judicial review. He…”
- Cited — M Sport Ltd, R (On the Application Of) v Her Majesty's Revenue And Customs 2021-04-16
“…ing proceedings, the case fell within the second category of case identified by Lord Neuberger MR in R(M) v Croydon London Borough Council [2012] EWCA Civ 595, [2012] 1 WLR 2607 at [60].…”
- Applied — RS, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Brent 2020-12-18
“…Appeal in M v Croydon LBC [2012] 1 WLR 2607 (“M”) categorised cases into three types and identified principles to be applied in each category whilst at the same time recognising that all cases were fact …”
- Cited — JH (Palestinian Territories) v Upper Tribunal of the Immigration And Asylum Chamber & Anor 2020-07-17
“… the application of s 51(3) and CPR 44 and the principles to be derived from several recent authorities are clear (see R(M) -v- Croydon v London Borough Council[2012] 1 WLR 2607,[58] and Faqiri [34]). Although any decision relating to costs is a matter for the discretion of the trial judge, generally a successful party can look to an u…”
- Cited — Parveen, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Redbridge 2020-03-12
“… she sought, and that she should have been awarded her costs in accordance with the guidance set out in M v Croydon London Borough Council [2012] EWCA Civ 595, [2012] 1 WLR 2607. The judge, Mr Steven Kovats QC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge), ruled that it was impossible, without conducting a full trial of the claim, to determin…”
- Followed — Sanneh, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2019-07-03
“…d to a number of authorities on its application. From these I need only extract the observations of Lord Neuberger MR in R (M) v Croydon London Borough Council [2012] 1 WLR 2607. At paragraph 62 he considered a number of permutations, one of which was a case in the Administrative Court where a party has succeeded only in part following…”
- Cited — Medway Soft Drinks Ltd & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v Revenue And Customs 2019-06-19
“…Mr Marquand recited the relevant history, referred to M v Croydon [2012] 1 WLR 2607 (which I will mention later) and said that he regarded Medway as having won the case completely as, looking at the final order sought and the consent order, th…”
- Cited — Khan & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-07-17
“…ading authority on this subject was and remains the decision of this Court in R (on the application of M) v Croydon London Borough Council [2012] EWCA Civ 599; [2012] 1 WLR 2607: see in particular the judgment of Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury MR (as he then was), at paras. 60-63.…”
- Applied — Rahman, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-07-06
“…This court considered the application of the general costs rules in the public law context in R (M) v Croydon London Borough Council[2012] EWCA Civ 595; [2012] 1 WLR 2607. At [44]-[46], Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury MR (with whom Hallett and Stanley Burnton LJJ agreed) identified three general principles which apply to costs afte…”
- Cited — Sirketi v Kupeli & Ors 2018-05-31
“… party”, CPR rule 44.2(2)(a) represents the prima facie or starting position (M v The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595; [2012] 1 WLR 2607 at [45] per Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury MR).…”
- Cited — ZN (Afghanistan) & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-05-11
“…art 44 of the Civil Procedure Rules (“CPR”) and the decision of this Court in R (on the application of M) v Croydon London Borough Council [2012] EWCA Civ 595; [2012] 1 WLR 2607.…”
- Cited — ZN (Afghanistan) & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-05-11
“…elevant. This accords with the third principle stated by Lord Neuberger MR in R (on the application of M) v Croydon London Borough Council [2012] EWCA Civ 595; [2012] 1 WLR 2607 at para. 47. I agree that section 30(1) of LASPO does not establish an absolute rule that this fact must always be ignored. As Singh LJ notes, section 30(1)(b)…”
- Applied — RL & Ors v The London Borough of Croydon 2018-04-11
“…That the judge failed properly to apply the test in R (M) v Croydon London Borough Council [2012] 1 WLR 2607 as to whether the claim had in substance succeeded; and…”
- Cited — RL & Ors v The London Borough of Croydon 2018-04-11
“…of the human rights claims that the claimants should be regarded as having succeeded so that in accordance with Bahta’s case [2011] 5 Costs LR 857 and M’s case [2012] 1 WLR 2607 they should normally receive their costs? Secondly, if so, was there a good reason for making a different order?”…”
- Cited — Fayad, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-01-31
“…t. As this was a public law claim, the approach was informed by the principles set out by this court in M v Croydon London Borough Council [2012] EWCA Civ 595; [2012] 1 WLR 2607. Giving the substantive judgment of the court, at [60], Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury MR drew a distinction between three types of case, namely (i) a case where…”
- Cited — SM (Afghanistan) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-01-24
“…4 however left open the question of costs and invited further submissions setting out which of the three categories identified by this Court in M v Croydon LBC [2012] 1 WLR 2607, [2012] EWCA Civ 595 (Lord Neuberger MR, and Hallett and Stanley Burnton LJJ) was applicable.…”
- Considered — Nwankwo & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-01-12
“…context of costs orders. In my view sufficient guidance has already been given by this Court in the well-known case of R (M) v Croydon LBC [2012] EWCA Civ 595; [2012] 1 WLR 2607, in which this Court considered how applications for costs should be dealt with in judicial review proceedings, particularly where a case has been settled befo…”
- Cited — Nwankwo & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-01-12
“…[2012] 1 WLR 2607, they should be awarded their costs in the absence of a good reason to the contrary.”…”