How many times has [2021] EWCA Civ 1135 been cited?

[2021] EWCA Civ 1135 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2021] EWCA Civ 1135

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Explained · 1Cited · 1

Cited — Giannis Ntzegkoutanis v Georgios Kimonis & Ors 2023-12-12
“…Call”), Re Hut Group Ltd [2020] EWHC 5 (Ch), [2020] BCC 443 and, on appeal, [2021] EWCA Civ 904, [2021] BCC 970 (“Hut Group”) and Taylor Goodchild Ltd v Taylor [2021] EWCA Civ 1135, [2022] BCC 1155 (“Taylor Goodchild”). In Fi Call, Vos J took the “essence of the decision” in Chime to be that, “where the central claim was an action by the …”
Explained — Tyne and Wear Passenger Transport Executive (trading as Nexus) v National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers & Anor. 2022-10-27
“… rise to abuse of process can be seen from Aldi Stores Ltd v WSP Group plc, at paragraphs 29-31, and the other cases discussed in Taylor Goodchild Ltd v Taylor [2021] EWCA Civ 1135, at paragraphs 26-28. As Lord Bingham explained in Johnson v Gore Wood & Co, at paragraph 31, a “broad, merits-based judgment” is required when determining iss…”