How many times has [2004] EWHC 1566 (Ch) been cited?

[2004] EWHC 1566 (Ch) is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2004] EWHC 1566 (Ch)

· cited by 2 · influence score 12/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Athena Capital Fund Sicav-Fis S.C.A. & Ors. v Secretariat of State for the Holy See 2022-07-26
“…e there is an exclusive jurisdiction clause in favour of England, where there are “exceptionally strong grounds” for a stay (Mazur Media Ltd v Mazur Media GmbH [2004] EWHC 1566 (Ch), [2004] 1 WLR 2966 at [70]). He held, however, that there should be a stay in this case for two reasons. The first was that the Secretariat was “hamstrung from…”
Cited — Município de Mariana v BHP Group (UK) Ltd & Anor. 2022-07-08
“…Mazur Meda Ltd v Mazur Media GmbH [2004] EWHC 1566 (Ch), [2004] 1 WLR 2966 (“Mazur”). There at para. [69] Lawrence Collins J, having referred to the court’s inherent discretion to stay proceedings whenever necessary…”