Home › Cases › [2017] EWHC 2707 (QB)
[2017] EWHC 2707 (QB)
· cited by 3 · influence score 14 /100
Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.
How to cite [2017] EWHC 2707 (QB)
Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.
Treatment Cited · 3
Citation network [2017] EWHC 2707 (QB) Tuson v Murphy Lejonvarn v Burgess & Anor Lejonvarn v Burgess & Anor cited by
Cited by (3) Cited — Lejonvarn v Burgess & Anor 2020-02-06 “…osts) [2011] EWHC 653 (TCC); Barr v Biffa Waste Services Ltd (costs) [2011] EWHC 1107 (TCC); and Optical Express Ltd and Others v Associated Newspapers Limited [2017] EWHC 2707 (QB).…”
Cited — Lejonvarn v Burgess & Anor 2020-02-06 “…A similar comment can be found in the more recent decision of Warby J in Optical Express Limited and Others v Associated Newspapers Limited [2017] EWHC 2707 (QB), a case where indemnity costs were ordered after a Part 36 offer had been accepted out of time. Warby J said at paragraph 52:…”
Cited — Tuson v Murphy 2018-06-22 “…This decision was cited with approval by Warby J in Optical Express Ltd v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2017] EWHC 2707 (QB).…”
Frequently cited alongside