How many times has [2003] EWCA Civ 612 been cited?

[2003] EWCA Civ 612 is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2003] EWCA Civ 612

· cited by 3 · influence score 15/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2003] EWCA Civ 612

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2Considered · 1

Cited — Parveen, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Redbridge 2020-03-12
“…This approach has been adopted in a number of more recent cases, including Islam v Ali [2003] EWCA Civ 612 at paragraph 20.…”
Cited — Lejonvarn v Burgess & Anor 2020-02-06
“…This approach has been adopted in a number of more recent cases, including Islam v Ali [2003] EWCA Civ 612 at paragraph 20.…”
Considered — Hislop v Perde 2018-07-23
“…e erred in principle or left out of account (or took into account) some material feature that he or she should (or should not) have considered: see Islam v Ali [2003] EWCA Civ 612. Moreover, in a case where the exercise of discretion concerns the award of costs, the discretion could be regarded as at its widest. As Wilson J (as he then w…”