How many times has [2020] EWHC 2658 (QB) been cited?

[2020] EWHC 2658 (QB) is cited by 3 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2020] EWHC 2658 (QB)

· cited by 3 · influence score 20/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2Considered · 1

Cited — Janice Wright v Yvonne Rogers 2022-12-16
“…Mr. Trim then cited the decision of the High Court in Oliver v. Shaikh [2020] EWHC 2658 (QB), saying that it contained a useful summary of the law on sentencing for civil contempt, but also that “it has some factual similarity to the current matter”. T…”
Considered — Business Mortgage Finance 4 Plc & Ors v Rizwan Hussain 2022-10-04
“…[2020] EWHC 2658 (QB) at [16] that “[s]imilar to the role of the prosecution in a criminal court where the court is considering sentence, the party seeking punishment of the contemn…”
Cited — Lockett v Minstrell Recruitment Ltd 2021-02-01
“…uthority v McKendrick [2019] 4 WLR 65 and described the kinds of factors that should be taken into account as summarised by Nicklin J in Oliver v Shaikh (No.2) [2020] EWHC 2658 (QB) at [17]-[18].…”