How many times has [2021] EWHC 947 (TCC) been cited?

[2021] EWHC 947 (TCC) is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2021] EWHC 947 (TCC)

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — The Good Law Project (R on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care 2022-03-24
“…s Ltd and others [2020] EWHC 1708 (QB) and Ideal (at first instance) [2020] EWHC 3399 (Ch), and also to Boxwood Leisure Ltd v Gleeson Construction Services Ltd [2021] EWHC 947 (TCC) (a case in which the court refused to grant relief under CPR 7.6, 3.9, 3.10 or 3.1(2)(m) in respect of late service of a claim form).…”
Cited — Ideal Shopping Direct Limited & Ors. v Mastercard Incorporated & Ors. 2022-01-13
“…uthorities including Piepenbrock, the decision of Morgan J in the present caseand the decision of O’Farrell J in Boxwood Leisure v Gleeson Construction Services[2021] EWHC 947 (TCC). Foxton J then drew his own conclusion as to the correct approach at [51]-[52]:…”