How many times has [2001] UKHL 29 been cited?

[2001] UKHL 29 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2001] UKHL 29

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2001] UKHL 29

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — U3 v Secretary of State for the Home Department 2023-07-14
“…n Act (‘the 1997 Act’) read in its context, and on a correct understanding of two decisions, in particular: Secretary of State for the Home Department v Rehman [2001] UKHL 29; [2003] 1 AC 153 (‘Rehman’) and Begum v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] UKSC 7; [2022] AC 765 (‘Begum’). Rehman did not concern section 2B. A…”
Cited — Phonographic Performance Ltd v Ellis (t/a Bla Bla Bar) 2018-12-18
“…Exemplary damages on the other hand are intended to punish. As Lord Nicholls put it in Kuddus v Chief Constable of Leicestershire [2001] UKHL 29, [2002] 2 AC 122 at [51]:…”