- Cited — Richard Stoute & Anor v News Group Newspapers Limited 2023-05-19
“…6]-[58] and Lord Dyson in Weller at [20]-[31] and [63]. That this is a significant, but not determinative, factor was confirmed by the Supreme Court in Re JR38 [2015] UKSC 42, [2016] AC 1131 at [95]-[98] (Lord Toulson, with whom Lord Hodge agreed) and [113]-[114] (Lord Clarke of Stone-cum-Ebony, with whom Lord Hodge also agreed).…”
- Cited — Nihal Mohammed Kamal Brake v Geoffrey William Guy 2022-03-02
“…[2015] UKSC 42, [2016] AC 1131 and now in…”
- Cited — Dulgheriu & Anor v The London Borough of Ealing 2019-08-21
“…s there is a reasonable expectation of privacy or, which the authorities treat as synonymous, a legitimate expectation of protection: see, for example, Re JR38 [2015] UKSC 42, [2016] AC 1131, at [84]-[88].…”
- Cited — Butt, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2019-03-08
“…s activity in a public place: R (Catt) v Association of Chief Police Officers of England, Wales and Northern Ireland [2015] UKSC 9, [2015] AC 1065, and Re JR38 [2015] UKSC 42, [2016] AC 1131. Although the Supreme Court judgments in those two cases set out the relevant principles, Catt was only addressed by Mr Bowen at the very end o…”