- Cited — Dudley Metropolitan Council v Marilyn Mailley 2023-10-27
“… sense relevant to that claim. Another example is what Ms Callaghan referred to as the status of cohabitation, recognised by the Supreme Court in Re McLaughlin [2018] UKSC 48, [2018] 1 WLR 4250: in a particular case it may well be necessary to make a judgment whether the relationship in question was sufficiently close to amount to c…”
- Cited — Daniel Richard Jwanczuk v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions 2023-10-11
“…[2018] UKSC 48, [2018] 1 WLR 4250…”
- Considered — Re A (Parental Responsibility) 2023-06-16
“… of the four key steps when considering whether or not there has been a breach of ECHR, Art 14 read with Art 8 as set out by Baroness Hale PSC in Re McLaughlin [2018] UKSC 48 at paragraph 15:…”
- Disapproved — Re A (Parental Responsibility) 2023-06-16
“…In so holding, Lord Reed PSC disapproved the alternative formulation given by Baroness Hale PSC in Re McLaughlin [2018] 1 WLR 4250, [2018] UKSC 48 that the provision ‘will inevitably operate incompatibly in a legally significant number of cases’.…”
- Cited — The Secretary of State for the Home Department v R (on the application of) Joint Council for The Welfare of Immigrants 2020-04-21
“…It is difficult to disagree with Baroness Hale’s observation in In re McLaughlin [2018] UKSC 48; [2018] 1 WLR 4250 at [20]:…”
- Cited — The Secretary of State for the Home Department v R (on the application of) Joint Council for The Welfare of Immigrants 2020-04-21
“…[2018] UKSC 48; [2018] 1 WLR 4250, at [38]-[39] (Baroness Hale) and [83] (Lord Hodge)”.…”
- Cited — Elan-Cane, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor 2020-03-10
“…In Re McLaughlin [2018] UKSC 48:…”
- Applied — Langford v The Secretary of State for Defence 2019-07-17
“…Court applied the test in the recent case of In re McLaughlin [2018] UKSC 48; [2018] 1 WLR 4250, at paras 38-39…”
- Cited — SC & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Work And Pensions & Ors 2019-04-16
“…This interpretation is confirmed by the decision of the Supreme Court in In re McLaughlin [2018] UKSC 48; [2018] 1 WLR 4250, in which judgment was given after the judgment of Ouseley J in the present case. In the McLaughlin case a woman was…”
- Applied — SC & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Work And Pensions & Ors 2019-04-16
“…disproportionate to the legitimateaim pursued” (emphasis added). It also reflects how the Supreme Court applied the test in the recent case of In re McLaughlin [2018] UKSC 48; [2018] 1 WLR 4250, at paras 38-39 (Baroness Hale) and para 83 (Lord Hodge).…”
- Cited — SC & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Work And Pensions & Ors 2019-04-16
“…Reference was again made to the UNCRC in In re McLaughlin [2018] UKSC 48; [2018] 1 WLR 4250 to “reinforce” a conclusion that there had been a breach of article 14. As mentioned earlier, the breach found in that case consisted in den…”