- Cited — Michael Holmes v Poeton Holdings Limited 2023-11-22
“…[2021] UKSC 1, [2021] AC 649, and her recent article “…”
- Cited — Geoquip Marine Operations AG v Tower Resources Cameroon SA & Anor 2023-03-21
“…over, Tower did not really contest Geoquip’s reliance on [171]-[176] of the joint judgment of Lords Hamblen and Leggatt in FCA v. Arch Insurance (UK) Ltd & Ors [2021] UKSC 1, [2021] AC 649 (SC) at [171]-[176] as establishing that, where there are two or more concurrent, equally effective causes of an event, and only one engages the…”
- Applied — Al Mana Lifestyle Trading LLC & Ors v United Fidelity Insurance Company PSC & Ors 2023-01-31
“…Applying the approach of the Supreme Court in Financial Conduct Authority v Arch Insurance (UK) Ltd [2021] UKSC 1, [2021] AC 649 at [77], the judge set herself the task of considering “how the words of the contract would be understood by a reasonable person to whom the doc…”
- Cited — Brian Leighton (Garages) Limited v Allianz Insurance plc 2023-01-11
“…contra proferentem principle and/or the approach articulated by Lords Hamblen and Leggatt JJSC at [77] of Financial Conduct Authority v Arch Insurance (UK) Ltd [2021] UKSC 1 [2021] AC 649 that:…”
- Cited — Bank of New York Mellon (International) Limited v Cine-UK Limited 2022-07-27
“…pandemic up until July 2020, as set out in [7] to [35] of the judgment of Lord Hamblen JSC and Lord Leggatt JSC in Financial Conduct Authority v Arch Insurance [2021] UKSC 1; [2021] AC 649. It is not necessary to repeat that history here. All that it is necessary to note is that it was and is common ground that the Hengrove tenant …”
- Cited — Zurich Insurance PLC v Niramax Group Ltd 2021-04-23
“…he effective cause test can exceptionally be satisfied where a but for test is not: see the discussion in Financial Conduct Authority v Arch Insurance (UK) Ltd [2021] UKSC 1; [2021] 2 WLR 123 at paragraphs 182-185. The important point for present purposes, however, is that Clarke LJ was not equiparating the two tests, as his use of…”