- Cited — Loreley Financing (Jersey) No 30 Limited v Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited & Ors 2022-11-10
“… narrowest possible limits consistent with the logic of its principle, an approach echoed in the speech of Lord Edmund-Davies in Waugh v British Railways Board [1980] AC 521 at 543. The competing principle of legal professional privilege is also rooted in public policy: cf B v Auckland District Law Society [2003] 2 AC 736, paras 46…”
- Cited — The Civil Aviation Authority v Jet2.Com Ltd, R. (on the Application of) 2020-01-28
“…w generally accepted that they are two distinct limbs of legal professional privilege with different characteristics (see, e.g., Waugh v British Railways Board [1980] AC 521 at page 541G-H per Lord Edmund-Davies, Three Rivers (No 6) at [103] per Lord Carswell, and Eurasian at [63]). One obvious difference is that established by Whe…”
- Cited — Addlesee & Ors v Dentons Europe LLP 2019-10-02
“… narrowest possible limits consistent with the logic of its principle, an approach echoed in the speech of Lord Edmund-Davies in Waugh v British Railways Board [1980] AC 521, 543. The competing principle of legal professional privilege is also rooted in public policy: cf B v Auckland District Law Society [2003] 2 AC 736, 756-757, p…”
- Cited — WH Holding Ltd & Anor v E20 Stadium LLP 2018-11-30
“… narrowest possible limits consistent with the logic of its principle, an approach echoed in the speech of Lord Edmund-Davies in Waugh v British Railways Board [1980] AC 521, 543. The competing principle of legal professional privilege is also rooted in public policy: cf B v Auckland District Law Society [2003] 2 AC 736, 756-757, p…”
- Cited — WH Holding Ltd & Anor v E20 Stadium LLP 2018-11-30
“…igation privilege, a document must have been produced for the sole or dominant purpose of conducting litigation: see for example Waugh v British Railways Board [1980] AC 521 per Lord…”