- Applied — Loreley Financing (Jersey) No 30 Limited v Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited & Ors 2022-11-10
“…tified the requirements for litigation privilege, set out by Lord Carswell in Three Rivers District Council v Governor & Company of the Bank of England (No. 6) [2004] UKHL 48, [2005] 1 AC 610 at [102] and applied by this court in Director of the Serious Fraud Office v Eurasian Natural Resources Corpn Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 2006, [2019]…”
- Cited — Candey Limited v Basem Bosheh & Anor 2022-08-01
“… 563 at [7] as “a fundamental human right long established in the common law”; see also Lord Carswell in Three Rivers District Council v Bank of England (No 6) [2004] UKHL 48, [2005] 1 AC 610 at [87].…”
- Followed — TBD (Owen Holland) Ltd v Simons & ors 2020-09-08
“…The test for litigation privilege was stated by Lord Carswell inThree Rivers District Council v Governor and Company of the Bank of England (No. 6) [2004] UKHL 48, [2005] 1 AC 610 at [102] in the following terms:…”
- Explained — Sports Direct International Plc v The Financial Reporting Council 2020-02-18
“…certainly the basis of his judgment. The second answer is that, as Lord Scott explained in Three Rivers DC v Governor and Company of the Bank of England (No 6) [2004] UKHL 48,…”
- Cited — The Civil Aviation Authority v Jet2.Com Ltd, R. (on the Application of) 2020-01-28
“…from Tomlinson J (“Three Rivers (No 5)”) at [32], as commended by Lord Carswell in Three Rivers Council v The Governorand Company of the Bank of England (No 6) [2004] UKHL 48; [2005] 1 AC 610 (“Three Rivers (No 6)”) at [70]);…”
- Applied — Raiffeisen Bank International AG v Asia Coal Energy Ventures Ltd & Anor 2020-01-21
“…This passage was approved by the House of Lords in Three Rivers District Council v Bank of England (No.6) [2004] UKHL 48, [2005] 1 AC 610 at [38] (Lord Scott), [58] to [60] (Lord Rodger) [62] (Lady Hale) and [111] (Lord Carswell) and has been applied in many cases since (e.g. Dir…”
- Followed — BGC Brokers LP & Ors v Tradition (UK) Ltd & Ors 2019-11-18
“…The rule with respect to litigation privilege was stated by Lord Carswell in Three Rivers District Council v Governor and Company of the Bank of England (No 6) [2004] UKHL 48, [2005] 1 AC 610 at [102] in the following terms:…”
- Explained — Addlesee & Ors v Dentons Europe LLP 2019-10-02
“…Scott explained in Three Rivers DC v Governor and Company of the Bank of England (No 6) [2004] UKHL 48, [2005] 1 AC 610 at [35], legal advice privilege “should be given a scope that reflects the policy reasons that justify its presence in our law.” That, to my m…”
- Cited — WH Holding Ltd & Anor v E20 Stadium LLP 2018-11-30
“…It is now clear from the decision of the House of Lords in Three Rivers DC v Governor and Company of the Bank of England (No 6) [2004] UKHL 48, [2005] 1 AC 610 that legal professional privilege is a single integral privilege, whose subheads are legal advice privilege and litigation privilege; and that…”
- Cited — Serious Fraud Office (SFO) v Eurasian Natural Resources Corp. Ltd 2018-09-05
“…sel and analysed by the House of Lords in Three Rivers (No. 6) [Three Rivers District Council and Others v. Governor and Company of the Bank of England (No. 6) [2004] UKHL 48 (“Three Rivers (No. 6)”)].…”
- Cited — Kerman v Akhmedova 2018-02-27
“… privilege is well-settled by the authorities: see, in particular, Three Rivers District Council and others v Governor and Company of the Bank of England (No 6)[2004] UKHL 48, [2005] 1 AC 610. The overarching principle is that confidential communications between client and solicitor for the purpose of obtaining legal advice – what t…”
- Cited — Kerman v Akhmedova 2018-02-27
“… no legal professional privilege. As Lord Scott of Foscote said in Three Rivers District Council and others v Governor and Company of the Bank of England (No 6)[2004] UKHL 48, [2005] 1 AC 610, para 38:…”