- Cited — Loreley Financing (Jersey) No 30 Limited v Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited & Ors 2022-11-10
“…client must be sure that what he tells his lawyer in confidence will never be revealed without his consent”); B v Auckland District Law Society [2003] UKPC 38, [2003] 2 AC 736 at [47] (Lord Millett: “A lawyer must be able to give his client an absolute and unqualified assurance that whatever the client tells him in confidence will ne…”
- Cited — Loreley Financing (Jersey) No 30 Limited v Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited & Ors 2022-11-10
“…lways Board [1980] AC 521 at 543. The competing principle of legal professional privilege is also rooted in public policy: cf B v Auckland District Law Society [2003] 2 AC 736, paras 46-7. It is not based upon the maintenance of confidentiality, although in earlier case-law that was given as its foundation. If that were the only reas…”
- Cited — Candey Limited v Basem Bosheh & Anor 2022-08-01
“…ight to resist compulsory disclosure of information”, relying upon Lord Millett’s statement to that effect in B v Auckland District Law Society [2003] UKPC 38, [2003] 2 AC 736 at [67]. That is undoubtedly correct so far as it goes, but I do not accept that it is complete statement of the nature of the right. The effect of privilege i…”
- Cited — Sports Direct International Plc v The Financial Reporting Council 2020-02-18
“…[2003] UKPC 38, [2003] 2 AC 736 (‘B v Auckland’). The issue there was whether the powers conferred on the Auckland District Law Society for investigating a complaint against a law firm implie…”
- Cited — Addlesee & Ors v Dentons Europe LLP 2019-10-02
“…In B v Auckland District Law Society [2003] UKPC 38, [2003] 2 AC 736 the Law Society was investigating a complaint against solicitors. They handed certain documents to counsel appointed by the Law Society on the express basis th…”
- Cited — Addlesee & Ors v Dentons Europe LLP 2019-10-02
“…ailways Board [1980] AC 521, 543. The competing principle of legal professional privilege is also rooted in public policy: cf B v Auckland District Law Society [2003] 2 AC 736, 756-757, paras 46-47. It is not based upon the maintenance of confidentiality, although in earlier case law that was given as its foundation. If that were the…”
- Cited — WH Holding Ltd & Anor v E20 Stadium LLP 2018-11-30
“…ailways Board [1980] AC 521, 543. The competing principle of legal professional privilege is also rooted in public policy: cf B v Auckland District Law Society [2003] 2 AC 736, 756-757, paras 46-47. It is not based upon the maintenance of confidentiality, although in earlier case law that was given as its foundation.”…”
- Cited — Serious Fraud Office (SFO) v Eurasian Natural Resources Corp. Ltd 2018-09-05
“…Lord Scott also referred to passages to a similar effect in B v. Auckland District Law Society[2003] 2 AC 736 at paragraph 47 per Lord Millett, in Upjohn Co v. United States (1981) 449 US 383 per Justice Rehnquist in the US Supreme Court, in Jones v. Smith [1999] 1 SCR…”