How many times has [1986] A.C. 484 been cited?

[1986] A.C. 484 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[1986] A.C. 484

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[1986] A.C. 484

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Nadia Zaman v London Borough Of Waltham Forest 2023-03-24
“… inquiries they would have made in the circumstances, the court must have regard to the speech of Lord Brightman in R. v. Hillingdon L.B.C., ex parte Puhlhofer [1986] A.C. 484 where he said at p. 518:…”
Cited — London Borough of Waltham Forest v Saleh 2019-11-19
“…[1986] A.C. 484 at 518,…”