“…er is required to reach his decision by reference to the state of affairs at the date of his decision: see Mohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2001] UKHL 57; [2002] 1 A.C. 547; Banks v Kingston upon Thames RLBC [2008] EWCA Civ 1443; [2009] H.L.R. 29; NJ v Wandsworth LBC [2013] EWCA Civ 1373; [2014] H.L.R. 6. There is only one issue w…”
“…hat duty (if any) “is” owed to the applicant under Pt 7. Secondly, binding case law is to the contrary. In Mohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2001] UKHL 57; [2002] 1 A.C. 547 the House of Lords held that events subsequent to the application could be taken into account on the review. As Lord Slynn put it the decision of the reviewing…”