How many times has [2001] 1 WLR 563 been cited?

[2001] 1 WLR 563 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2001] 1 WLR 563

· cited by 2 · influence score 14/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2001] 1 WLR 563

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Approved · 1Cited · 1

Cited — London Borough of Waltham Forest v Saleh 2019-11-19
“… applicant and his or her family and the location of the proposed accommodation may also be relevant to that assessment: see R (ex parte Sacupima) v Newham LBC [2001] 1 WLR 563 (“Sacupima”)at page 575;…”
Approved — Lomax v Gosport Borough Council 2018-08-01
“…e accommodation is not merely a question of size and physical arrangement. The location of the accommodation is also a key factor. In R (Sacupima) v Newham LBC [2001] 1 WLR 563, 575 (approved by the Supreme Court in Nzolameso v Westminster CC [2015] UKSC 22, [2015] PTSR 549) Latham LJ put it this way:…”