- Cited — Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha & Ors v Mark McLaren Class Representative Limited 2023-12-08
“…losure of the communications; privilege is a right, which cannot be overridden as a matter of case management or discretion: R v Derby Magistrates Court Ex p B [1996] AC 487; Three Rivers DC v Bank of England (No 6) [2005] 1 AC 610 at [25]. The Ruling has resulted in that principle being breached in this case, and would potentially…”
- Cited — Loreley Financing (Jersey) No 30 Limited v Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited & Ors 2022-11-10
“…privilege, in more modern language, can be found in other cases also cited in the speeches in Three Rivers (No. 6): see R v Derby Magistrates Court, ex parte B [1996] AC 487, 507 (Lord Taylor: “… a man must be able to consult his lawyer in confidence, since otherwise he might hold back half the truth. The client must be sure that w…”
- Cited — Candey Limited v Basem Bosheh & Anor 2022-08-01
“…The leading cases on litigation privilege is R v Derby Magistrates Court [1996] AC 487, 507. There, Lord Taylor of Gosforth CJ said:…”
- Considered — Candey Limited v Basem Bosheh & Anor 2022-08-01
“…The starting point in considering this argument is the principle identified by Lord Taylor of Gosforth CJ in R v Derby Magistrates’ Court ex p B [1996] AC 487 at 507 as underlying legal professional privilege:…”
- Cited — Sports Direct International Plc v The Financial Reporting Council 2020-02-18
“…re the hearing of this appeal. Any discussion of the modern law of LPP must start with the speech of Lord Taylor of Gosforth CJ in R v Derby Magistrates’ Court [1996] AC 487 (‘Derby Magistrates’). Lord Taylor (with whom the other members of the Appellate Committee agreed) referred at p. 203H to the long-established rule that a docu…”
- Followed — The Civil Aviation Authority v Jet2.Com Ltd, R. (on the Application of) 2020-01-28
“…House of Lords agreed) in R v Derby Magistrates’ Court ex parte B [1996] AC 487 (“ex parte B”) at page 507C-D, as follows:…”