- Cited — Amina Ahamed, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Haringey 2023-08-11
“… Court for which sections 202 and 204 of the 1996 Act provide were an innovation. Commenting on the change in Nipa Begum v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council [2000] 1 WLR 306, (2000) 32 HLR 445, Auld LJ said at 314:…”
- Cited — James v Hertsmere Borough Council 2020-04-02
“…In Nipa Begum v Tower Hamlets LBC [2000] 1 WLR 306 the county court judge (Judge Platt) held that an appeal under s. 204 extended to a consideration of any issues that could be raised in judicial review proceed…”
- Cited — James v Hertsmere Borough Council 2020-04-02
“…ounty Court's jurisdiction [under s. 204] is appellate it is in substance the same as that of the High Court in judicial review: Nipa Begum v Tower Hamlets LBC [2000] 1 WLR 306. Thus the court may not only quash the authority's decision under s 204(3) if it is held to be vitiated by legal misdirection or procedural impropriety, or unf…”
- Cited — Adesotu v Lewisham London Borough Council 2019-08-02
“…Ms Davies cited the decision of this court in Nipa Begum v Tower Hamlets LBC [2000] 1 WLR 306 in which it was held that a s 204 appeal was not limited to matters of legal interpretation but (per Auld LJ at 313E) could deal also with the full range of is…”
- Cited — Adesotu v Lewisham London Borough Council 2019-08-02
“…County Court’s jurisdiction [under s 204] is appellate it is in substance the same as that of the High Court in judicial review: Nipa Begum v Tower Hamlets LBC [2000] 1 WLR 306. Thus the court may not only quash the authority’s decision under s 204(3) if it is held to be vitiated by legal misdirection or procedural impropriety, or unf…”