- Cited — Joseph Kyle v Coventry City Council 2023-11-20
“…ction is appellate, it is in substance the same as that of the High Court in judicial review” (Runa Begum v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council [2003] UKHL 5, [2003] 2 AC 430, at paragraph 7, per Lord Bingham). The grounds of challenge can include “procedural error, the extent of legal powers (vires), irrationality and inadequacy of…”
- Cited — Amina Ahamed, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Haringey 2023-08-11
“…ction is appellate, it is in substance the same as that of the High Court in judicial review” (Runa Begum v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council [2003] UKHL 5, [2003] 2 AC 430, at paragraph 7, per Lord Bingham). The grounds of challenge can include “procedural error, the extent of legal powers (vires), irrationality and inadequacy of…”
- Cited — Nadia Zaman v London Borough Of Waltham Forest 2023-03-24
“…ction is appellate, it is in substance the same as that of the High Court in judicial review” (Runa Begum v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council [2003] UKHL 5, [2003] 2 AC 430, at paragraph 7, per Lord Bingham). The grounds of challenge can include “procedural error, the extent of legal powers (vires), irrationality and inadequacy of…”
- Cited — James v Hertsmere Borough Council 2020-04-02
“…This approach was noted with approval in Runa Begum v Tower Hamlets LBC [2003] 2 AC 430, where Lord Bingham stated at [7]:…”
- Cited — Langton, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Environment, Food And Rural Affairs & Anor 2019-09-17
“…erve the statutory purpose of preventing the spread of disease. Mr Turney cited authorities such as Begum v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council [2003] UKHL 5; [2003] 2 AC 430, [7], per Lord Bingham, [99], per Lord Millett; IBA Health Ltd v Office of Fair Trading [2004] EWCA Civ 142; [2004] ICR 1364, [93], per Carnwath LJ; and R (on …”
- Approved — Adesotu v Lewisham London Borough Council 2019-08-02
“…judicial review. This was approved by the House of Lords in Runa Begum v Tower Hamlets LBC [2003] 2 AC 430, where Lord Bingham of Cornhill said at [7]:-…”
- Cited — Lomax v Gosport Borough Council 2018-08-01
“…nciples upon which an appeal court acts in cases of this kind are authoritatively stated by the House of Lords in Runa Begum v Tower Hamlets LBC [2003] UKHL 5, [2003] 2 AC 430. Lord Bingham said at [7]:…”
- Cited — Rother District Council v Freeman-Roach 2018-03-06
“…e issues before the Court with a reference to the statement by Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe in Runa Begum v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council [2003] UKHL 5, [2003] 2 AC 430 at [114]. Lord Walker stressed that establishing priority need may call for the exercise, and sometimes for a very difficult exercise, of evaluative judgment o…”