How many times has [2003] Fam 103 been cited?

[2003] Fam 103 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2003] Fam 103

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2003] Fam 103

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 1Followed · 1

Followed — XW v XH 2019-12-18
“…he courts became aware of the scope for this issue significantly to undermine the nondiscriminatory principle. Rapid retrenchment followed in Lambert v Lambert [2003] Fam 103, Miller and Charman, confining the ability to argue special contribution to very exceptional circumstances.…”
Cited — Waggott v Waggott 2018-04-11
“…In a pre-Miller case, Lambert v Lambert [2003] Fam 103, Thorpe LJ (para 60) could see “no possible reason why the wife alone should be required to amortise” her share of the marital wealth to meet her needs. Likewi…”