How many times has [2006] 1 All ER 112 been cited?

[2006] 1 All ER 112 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2006] 1 All ER 112

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2006] 1 All ER 112

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Nadia Zaman v London Borough Of Waltham Forest 2023-03-24
“…ng with an ‘out of borough’ placement policy, such as R (Yumsak) v Enfield London Borough Council [2003] HLR 1, and R (Calgin) v Enfield London Borough Council [2006] 1 All ER 112, were decided.”…”
Cited — London Borough of Bromley v Broderick 2020-11-16
“…ng with an ‘out of borough’ placement policy, such as R (Yumsak) v Enfield London Borough Council [2003] HLR 1, and R (Calgin) v Enfield London Borough Council [2006] 1 All ER 112, were decided.”…”