How many times has [2018] 2 WLR 1617 been cited?

[2018] 2 WLR 1617 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2018] 2 WLR 1617

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2018] 2 WLR 1617

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 1Explained · 1

Cited — XW v XH 2019-12-18
“…(“Charman”); and Sharp v Sharp [2018] 2 WLR 1617 (“Sharp”).…”
Explained — XW v XH 2019-12-18
“…harman (No 4) [2007] EWCA Civ 503, [2007] 1 FLR 1246 and, as explained above, I do not interpret the more recent decision in Sharp v Sharp [2017] EWCA Civ 408, [2018] 2 WLR 1617, [2017] 2 FLR 1095 as providing any support for a change in approach. But the nature and source of the property is relevant to deciding how the assets should b…”