- Cited — Joseph Kyle v Coventry City Council 2023-11-20
“…In Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames London Borough Council [2009] UKHL 7, [2009] 1 WLR 413, in a passage endorsed by the Supreme Court in Poshteh v Kensington and Chelsea Royal London Borough Council [2017] UKSC 36, [2017] AC 624, L…”
- Cited — Katie-Leigh Webb-Harnden v London Borough of Waltham Forest 2023-08-22
“… given to the relevant matters: see the observations of Lord Neuberger at paragraphs 49 to 50 of Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-upon-Thames London Borough Council [2009] UKHL 7, [2009] 1 WLR 413 and the observations of Baroness Hale at paragraph 32 of her judgment in Nzolameso v Westminster City Council (Secretary of State for Communi…”
- Cited — Amina Ahamed, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Haringey 2023-08-11
“…In Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames London Borough Council [2009] UKHL 7, [2009] 1 WLR 413, in a passage endorsed by the Supreme Court in Poshteh v Kensington and Chelsea Royal London Borough Council [2017] UKSC 36, [2017] AC 624, L…”
- Cited — Nadia Zaman v London Borough Of Waltham Forest 2023-03-24
“…In Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames London Borough Council [2009] UKHL 7, [2009] 1 WLR 413, in a passage endorsed by the Supreme Court in Poshteh v Kensington and Chelsea Royal London Borough Council [2017] UKSC 36, [2017] AC 624, L…”
- Cited — London Borough of Bromley v Broderick 2020-11-16
“…In Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames London Borough Council [2009] UKHL 7, [2009] 1 WLR 413, in a passage endorsed by the Supreme Court in Poshteh v Kensington and Chelsea Royal London Borough Council [2017] UKSC 36, [2017] AC 624, L…”
- Cited — McMahon v Watford Borough Council 2020-04-08
“…nconsistencies, or adopt a nit-picking approach. Its assessment must be realistic and practical: Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames London Borough Council [2009] UKHL 7, [2009] 1 WLR 413. The reviewing officer is not writing an examination paper in housing law. Nor are they required to expound on the finer points of a decision…”
- Cited — LB v London Borough of Tower Hamlets 2020-03-24
“…and that a benevolent approach is to be adopted to the interpretation of review decisions (on the latter point, see Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-upon-Thames LBC [2009] UKHL 7 at [49] to [51] per Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury (with whom Lord Hoffmann and Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe expressly agreed)).…”
- Cited — B (Secure Accommodation Order), Re (Rev 1) 2019-11-21
“…ommission a particular placement or service for a child: A v Liverpool City Council [1982] AC 363, Holmes-Moorhouse vRichmond-upon-Terms London Borough Council [2009] UKHL 7, ACCG v MN [2017] AC 549. On the other hand, the court is not obliged to accept without question a local authority’s assertions as to its resources. As Sir Jam…”
- Cited — Guiste v The London Borough of Lambeth 2019-10-22
“…o the consideration and interpretation of review decisions: see the judgment of Lord Neuberger in Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond Upon ThamesLondon Borough Council [2009] UKHL 7, [2009] 1 WLR 413, at [45] to [51]. As Lord Neuberger there pointed out, such decisions are prepared by housing officers who are not lawyers and their decision…”
- Cited — Kannan v London Borough of Newham 2019-02-04
“…d adopt a benevolent approach; should not “nit-pick”; and should not subject the letter to minute textual criticism: Homes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames LBC [2009] UKHL 7, [2009] 1 WLR 413; Poshteh v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC; Rother DC v Freeman-Roach [2018] EWCA Civ 368, [2018] HLR 22.…”
- Cited — Alibkhiet v London Borough of Brent v City of Westminster 2018-12-06
“…rything that a housing authority does in performance or purported performance of its duties to the homeless. Thus in Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames LBC[2009] UKHL 7, [2009] 1 WLR 413, Lord Neuberger of…”
- Applied — Lomax v Gosport Borough Council 2018-08-01
“…ed with an appeal against a review decision: Rother DC v Freeman-Roach [2018] EWCA Civ 368, [2018] HLR 22; applying Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond Upon Thames LBC [2009] UKHL 7, [2009] 1 WLR 413.…”
- Cited — Kamara v London Borough Of Southwark 2018-07-12
“…ed and interpreted as if they were the judgments of a court or the opinion of a lawyer: see e.g. Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond-upon-Thames London Borough Council [2009] UKHL 7. The same context governs the operation of the Review Regulations. They are made by the Secretary of State under s.203 in order to set out the procedure to be …”
- Cited — Rother District Council v Freeman-Roach 2018-03-06
“…lous in the examination of a reviewing officer’s decision in order to identify errors of law. In Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council [2009] UKHL 7, [2009] 1 WLR 413 (‘Holmes-Moorhouse’)Lord Neuberger said:…”
- Cited — Rother District Council v Freeman-Roach 2018-03-06
“…se J’s comprehensive judgment. In this context the case most usually cited is the decision of the House of Lords in Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond Upon Thames LBC [2009] UKHL 7, [2009] 1 WLR 413, the relevant parts of which Rose J has quoted.…”