- Cited — Joseph Kyle v Coventry City Council 2023-11-20
“…on Borough Council [2009] UKHL 7, [2009] 1 WLR 413, in a passage endorsed by the Supreme Court in Poshteh v Kensington and Chelsea Royal London Borough Council [2017] UKSC 36, [2017] AC 624, Lord Neuberger said this about review decisions at paragraph 50:…”
- Cited — Amina Ahamed, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Haringey 2023-08-11
“…on Borough Council [2009] UKHL 7, [2009] 1 WLR 413, in a passage endorsed by the Supreme Court in Poshteh v Kensington and Chelsea Royal London Borough Council [2017] UKSC 36, [2017] AC 624, Lord Neuberger said this about review decisions at paragraph 50:…”
- Cited — Sahra Moge v London Brough of Ealing 2023-04-27
“…(A) v Croydon LBC [2009] UKSC 8, [2009] 1 WLR 2557; Nzolameso at [32], warning against “an overly technical or nit-picking approach”; Poshteh v Kensington RLBC [2017] UKSC 36, [2017] AC 624 at [22]; Alibkhiet at [36] to [38]; and Abdikadir at[ 59]).…”
- Cited — Nadia Zaman v London Borough Of Waltham Forest 2023-03-24
“…on Borough Council [2009] UKHL 7, [2009] 1 WLR 413, in a passage endorsed by the Supreme Court in Poshteh v Kensington and Chelsea Royal London Borough Council [2017] UKSC 36, [2017] AC 624, Lord Neuberger said this about review decisions at paragraph 50:…”
- Cited — London Borough of Bromley v Broderick 2020-11-16
“…on Borough Council [2009] UKHL 7, [2009] 1 WLR 413, in a passage endorsed by the Supreme Court in Poshteh v Kensington and Chelsea Royal London Borough Council [2017] UKSC 36, [2017] AC 624, Lord Neuberger said this about review decisions at paragraph 50:…”
- Cited — McMahon v Watford Borough Council 2020-04-08
“…to the question of vulnerability and also to the question whether the PSED has been fulfilled. In Poshteh v Kensington and Chelsea Royal London Borough Council [2017] UKSC 36 the question was whether the reviewer had lawfully determined that accommodation was suitable for Mrs Poshteh, having regard to her mental condition. The PSED …”
- Doubted — Kannan v London Borough of Newham 2019-02-04
“…ackground of serious shortage of housing and overwhelming demand from other applicants, many no doubt equally deserving”: Poshteh v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC [2017] UKSC 36, [2017] AC 624 at [39].…”
- Cited — Hopkinson & Ors v Towergate Financial (Group) Ltd & Ors 2018-12-06
“…ately defined intend to use such terms in accordance with the definitions”. Echoing as it does Lord Hodge’s observation in Wood v Capita Insurance Services Ltd [2017] UKSC 36, [2017] AC 1173, at [13] that some agreements may be successfully interpreted principally by textual analysis, for example because of their sophistication and …”
- Cited — Alibkhiet v London Borough of Brent v City of Westminster 2018-12-06
“… 2557 Lady Hale warned against the “judicialisation of claims to welfare services”; a warning that Lord Carnwath repeated in Poshteh v Kensington & Chelsea RLBC[2017] UKSC 36, [2017] AC 624 at [22]. He also noted at [35] the range of factors, including allocation of scarce resources, to which authorities are entitled to have regard …”
- Cited — Alibkhiet v London Borough of Brent v City of Westminster 2018-12-06
“…This approach is echoed in Nzolameso at [32], and Poshteh v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC[2017] UKSC 36, [2017] AC 624 at [39] in which Lord Carnwath said of the review decision:…”
- Applied — Lomax v Gosport Borough Council 2018-08-01
“…This test appears to me to have been approved by the Supreme Court in Poshteh v Kensington and Chelsea RLBC [2017] UKSC 36, [2017] AC 624 at [5]. In my judgment the same approach should be applied in determining whether it is reasonable for a particular applicant to continue to occ…”
- Cited — JT v First-Tier Tribunal 2018-07-24
“…idered by the UK Supreme Court in Ali v Birmingham City Council [2009] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39 and Poshteh v Kensington and Chelsea Royal London Borough Council [2017] UKSC 36; [2017] AC 624. In those cases the Supreme Court recognised a distinction between social security and welfare benefits whose substance is defined precisely and…”