- Cited — Archer, R (on the application of) v HM Revenue and Customs 2019-06-18
“…MRC rely on repeated statements of high authority that judicial review should be a remedy of last resort: see, for example, Kayv Lambeth London Borough Council [2006] UKHL 10, [2006] 2 AC 465, at [30] per Lord Bingham, and R (Cart) v Upper Tribunal [2011] UKSC 28, [2012] 1 AC 663, at [33] per Lord Phillips.…”
- Cited — AB, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for Justice 2019-01-18
“…bound by the decision of the House of Lords in Munjaz in accordance with the principle enunciated by the House of Lords in Kay v Lambeth London Borough Council [2006] UKHL 10; [2006] 2 AC 465.…”
- Followed — A & Anor. v Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority & Anor. 2018-07-03
“…follow a binding decision of the House of Lords or Supreme Court, despite its inconsistency with subsequent Strasbourg authority: Kay v Lambeth Borough Council [2006] UKHL 10; [2006] 2 AC 465.…”
- Considered — WB v W District Council 2018-04-26
“…confronted that situation. The question of precedent has been considered at the highest level in cases which engage rights under the ECHR. In Kay v Lambeth LBC [2006] UKHL 10, [2006] 2 AC 465, Lord Bingham discussed that question at [40] to [45] in a passage the whole of which repays careful study. For present purposes it is suffici…”
- Cited — Davies v Hertfordshire County Council 2018-03-06
“….L.R. 35 (a case affirmed on other grounds in Hounslow) and the (minority) opinion of Lord Bingham of Cornhill in Kay & Anor v. London Borough of Lambeth & Ors [2006] UKHL 10; [2006] 2 AC 465 at paras 29 and 30.…”
- Cited — AM (Zimbabwe) & Anor v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2018-01-30
“…f State for the Home Department. This is a result of application of the usual rules of precedent in this jurisdiction: see Kay v Lambeth London Borough Council [2006] UKHL 10; [2006] 2 AC 465, at [43].…”