- Cited — Assurant General Insurance Limited, R (on the application of) v Financial Ombudsman Service Limited & Ors 2023-09-18
“…pretation of the statute which confers the jurisdiction on the relevant public body: see the decision of the Supreme Court in R (A) v London Borough of Croydon [2009] UKSC 8; [2009] 1 WLR 2557. In that case a contrast was drawn between the concept of a “child”, defined as a person under the age of 18 in the Children Act 1989, which…”
- Cited — SB, R (on the application of) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea 2023-07-31
“…The issue in R (A) v Croydon London Borough Council [2009] UKSC 8; [2009] 1 WLR 2557 was whether the duty imposed by section 20 of the 1989 Act is owed to a person who, the local authority believes, is a child (subject to Wed…”
- Cited — Sahra Moge v London Brough of Ealing 2023-04-27
“…on hard-pressed local authorities with limited resources, faced with an acute housing shortage with multiple applicants for every property (R (A) v Croydon LBC [2009] UKSC 8, [2009] 1 WLR 2557; Nzolameso at [32], warning against “an overly technical or nit-picking approach”; Poshteh v Kensington RLBC [2017] UKSC 36, [2017] AC 624 a…”
- Cited — MS (A child) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department 2019-07-30
“…Having reviewed domestic cases in which the court has, in judicial review proceedings, accepted a fact finding role (e.g. in R (A) v London Borough of Croydon [2009] UKSC 8 with regard to age assessment) – and refraining from determining whether the application of the Dublin III hierarchy criteria is an exercise in determining a p…”
- Cited — Alibkhiet v London Borough of Brent v City of Westminster 2018-12-06
“…In R (A) v Croydon LBC[2009] UKSC 8, [2009] 1 WLR 2557 Lady Hale warned against the “judicialisation of claims to welfare services”; a warning that Lord Carnwath repeated in Poshteh v Kensington …”
- Cited — British Telecommunications Plc v BT Pension Scheme Trustees Ltd & Anor 2018-12-04
“…partment and another intervening) R (M) v Lambeth London Borough Council (Secretary of State for the Home Department and another intervening) [2009] 1 WLR 2557 [2009] UKSC 8. She says that where the trigger for a duty or obligation is a matter of evaluation, it is a matter for the decision-maker rather than the Court.…”
- Considered — JT v First-Tier Tribunal 2018-07-24
“…pplication of article 6(1) of the Convention to claims to social security benefits has been considered by the UK Supreme Court in Ali v Birmingham City Council [2009] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39 and Poshteh v Kensington and Chelsea Royal London Borough Council [2017] UKSC 36; [2017] AC 624. In those cases the Supreme Court recognised a …”