- Cited — Richard Stoute & Anor v News Group Newspapers Limited 2023-05-19
“…nt the further publication of material that is already in the public domain if such an injunction would serve a useful purpose: PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26; [2016] AC 1081 per Lord Mance at [25]-[32].”…”
- Cited — Rashid Maqsood Abbasi & Anor v Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust 2023-03-31
“… in Re S,BBC and Guardian cases where the immediate impact of identification was entirely predictable. So too in cases such as PJS v. News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26; [2016] AC 1081 where discrete private information about a well-known family would have had a clear adverse impact if published. The Supreme Court concluded th…”
- Cited — Nihal Mohammed Kamal Brake v Geoffrey William Guy 2022-03-02
“…[2016] UKSC 26, [2016] AC 108 at [20]:…”
- Cited — Nihal Mohammed Kamal Brake v Geoffrey William Guy 2022-03-02
“…[2016] UKSC 26, Lord Mance at [20] observed that the balancing exercise involved in the second stage of a claim for misuse of private information was…”
- Cited — Al M (Children) 2020-02-28
“…[2016] UKSC 26, the fact that the interests of a child may not be 'a trump card' does not mean that those interests should be dismissed.…”
- Cited — Al M (Children) 2020-02-28
“…Thirdly, reference is made to the extent of information already in the public domain and to PJS v News Group Newspapers [2016] 1 AC 25, [2016] UKSC 26. That does not assist. PJS is wholly different, as highlighted by Mr Caldecott, it related to a wholly private matter containing none of the confines of a judg…”
- Cited — XW v XH 2019-04-02
“…entified the parties or other members of their family (paragraph 23). A right against unwanted intrusion arose in the case (see PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26, [2016] AC 1081(PJS)). The judge said:…”
- Cited — Stunt v Associated Newspapers Ltd 2018-07-30
“…o account the provisions of the HRA – a balancing exercise which take places even at the interlocutory stage: see, for example, PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26, [2016] AC 1081, especially at [20] and [33]. The argument continues that sub-sections (4) and (5) of section 32 are, on the other hand, purely procedural. The…”