- Cited — London Borough of Haringey v FZO 2020-02-18
“…addressed broadly; see in particular the passage in Diplock LJ’s judgment in Ilkiw v Samuels [1963] 1 WLR 991, 1004 included in the citation from Rose v Plenty [1976] 1 WLR 141, 147-148 (at para 38 above) and cited also in Lister v Hesley Hall Ltd [2002] 1 AC 215 by Lord Steyn at para 20, Lord Clyde, at para 42, Lord Hobhouse, at para…”
- Cited — Group Seven Ltd & Anor v Notable Services LLP & Anor (Rev 2) 2019-04-11
“…ess instructions” and as a result, “the law has given the concept of ‘ordinary course of employment’ an extended scope.” As Scarman LJ observed in Rose vPlenty [1976] 1 WLR 141 at…”
- Cited — WM Morrison Supermarkets Plc v Various Claimants 2018-10-22
“…v Nottinghamshire County Council [2017] UKSC 60; [2018] AC 355, Bazley v Curry (1999) 174 DLR (4th) 45, Lister v Hesley Hall Ltd [2002] A.C. 215, Rose v Plenty [1976] 1 WLR 141, Century Insurance Co Ltd v Northern Ireland Road Transport Board [1942] AC 509, Mattis v Pollock [2003] EWCA Civ 887, Williams v Hemphill [1966] UKHL 3, Credi…”
- Cited — Bellman v Northampton Recruitment Ltd 2018-10-11
“…rd Nicholls at [24]. In my view, it is not clear that either Lord Millett in his dissenting judgment in Dubai Aluminium at [112] or Scarman LJ in Rose v Plenty [1976] 1 WLR 141 at 147 – 8, quoted in Mohamud at [38], had in mind the equivalent of Lord Toulson’s second question in Mohamud. Lord Millett was concerned with whether the act…”