How many times has [2010] 1 WLR 1441 been cited?

[2010] 1 WLR 1441 is cited by 4 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2010] 1 WLR 1441

· cited by 4 · influence score 15/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2010] 1 WLR 1441

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 3Explained · 1

Cited — Barry Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses v BXB 2021-03-15
“…Maga v Archbishop of Birmingham and Anr [2010] 1 WLR 1441 (“Maga”)…”
Explained — Barry Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses v BXB 2021-03-15
“…LR (4th) 45 at [46], which has been influential in this jurisdiction. This was explained by Longmore LJ in Maga v Archbishop of Birmingham [2010] EWCA Civ 256, [2010] 1 WLR 1441:…”
Cited — Group Seven Ltd & Anor v Notable Services LLP & Anor (Rev 2) 2019-04-11
“…[2010] 1 WLR 1441…”
Cited — Bellman v Northampton Recruitment Ltd 2018-10-11
“…ound: Mohamud at [50] and [54] per Lord Dyson; Weddall v Barchester Healthcare Ltd [2012] IRLR 307 per Aikens LJ at [68]; Maga v Archbishop of Birmingham & Anr [2010] 1 WLR 1441 per Lord Neuberger MR at [43]; and Dubai AluminiumCo Ltd v Salaam & Ors [2003] 2 AC 366 per Lord Nicholls at [24]. In my view, it is not clear that either Lord…”