How many times has [2012] IRLR 307 been cited?

[2012] IRLR 307 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2012] IRLR 307

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2012] IRLR 307

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 2

Cited — Group Seven Ltd & Anor v Notable Services LLP & Anor (Rev 2) 2019-04-11
“…rt to come to an evaluative judgment. It is necessarily highly fact sensitive. See Mohamud at [50] and [54] per Lord Dyson; Weddall v Barchester Healthcare Ltd [2012] IRLR 307 per Aikens LJ at [68]; Maga v Archbishop of Birmingham & Anr[2010] 1 WLR 1441per Lord Neuberger MR at [43]; and Dubai AluminiumCo Ltd v Salaam & Ors[2003] 2 AC…”
Cited — Bellman v Northampton Recruitment Ltd 2018-10-11
“…valuative judgment. It is a question of law based upon the primary facts as found: Mohamud at [50] and [54] per Lord Dyson; Weddall v Barchester Healthcare Ltd [2012] IRLR 307 per Aikens LJ at [68]; Maga v Archbishop of Birmingham & Anr [2010] 1 WLR 1441 per Lord Neuberger MR at [43]; and Dubai AluminiumCo Ltd v Salaam & Ors [2003] 2…”