- Explained — Nadia Zaman v London Borough Of Waltham Forest 2023-03-24
“…f appeal which have real prospects of success but are of no wider significance. As Brooke LJ explained in Tanfern Ltd v Cameron-Macdonald [2000] EWCA Civ 3023, [2000] 1 WLR 1311, at paragraph 42, the enactment of section 55 of the Access to Justice Act 1999 introduced a “major change to our appeal procedures” such that it would “no lon…”
- Cited — Mousavi-Khalkali v Abrishamchi & Anor 2020-11-12
“…erfere with the Judge’s exercise of his discretion in this regard, referring to the well-known principle identified by Brooke LJ in Tanfern v Cameron Macdonald [2000] 1 WLR 1311 at [32]:…”
- Cited — Prescott v Potamianos & Anor 2019-06-06
“…oting Lord Fraser of Tullybelton in G v G (Minors: Custody Appeal) [1985] 1 WLR 647, as quoted by Brooke LJ in Tanfern Ltd. v Cameron-MacDonald (Practice Note) [2000] 1 WLR 1311, 1317, in turn quoted by Clarke LJ (as he then was) in Assicurazioni Generali SpA v Arab Insurance Group [2003] 1 WLR 577, 579, paragraph 9.…”
- Cited — General Medical Council v Hayat 2018-12-13
“…an exercise of discretion, this court would have to be satisfied that a high hurdle has been surmounted before it intervenes. In Canfern Ltd v Cameron McDonald [2000] 1 WLR 1311 at [32], Brooke LJ said that the appellate court should only interfere with such decisions where the decision of the court below “exceeded the generous ambit w…”