How many times has [2008] EWCA Civ 446 been cited?

[2008] EWCA Civ 446 is cited by 4 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2008] EWCA Civ 446

· cited by 4 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2008] EWCA Civ 446

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Cited · 4

Cited — Richard Stoute & Anor v News Group Newspapers Limited 2023-05-19
“…tephens described the two stage test laid down by the Court of Appeal in McKennitt v Ash [2006] EWCA Civ 1714, [2008] QB 73 and Murray v Express Newspapers plc [2008] EWCA Civ 446, [2009] Ch 481, which I have summarised in paragraph 20 above, as “well established”.…”
Cited — HRH The Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Limited 2021-12-02
“…Book and her intentions in relation to disclosing the Letter were relevant to the assessment of the Murray factors (taken from Murray v. Express Newspapers plc [2008] EWCA Civ 446, [2009] Ch 481 at [36]) at stage one, (4) the judge gave inadequate weight to the Article 10 rights engaged, and assessed them on an overly restrictive basis, …”
Cited — Lloyd v Google LLC 2019-10-02
“…Murray v. Express Newspapers [2008] EWCA Civ 446 at [63].…”
Cited — Dulgheriu & Anor v The London Borough of Ealing 2019-08-21
“…es cited by the Judge in this part of his judgment - Peck v United Kingdom (2003) no. 44647/98, Couderc v France [2016] EMLR 19 and Murray v Express Newspapers [2008] EWCA Civ 446, [2009] Ch 481…”