How many times has [2005] UKHL 49 been cited?

[2005] UKHL 49 is cited by 2 judgment(s) in this dataset.

[2005] UKHL 49

· cited by 2 · influence score 13/100

Is it still good law? No negative treatment found in this dataset — it has been cited without being doubted or overruled here.

How to cite

[2005] UKHL 49

Neutral citation format (OSCOLA). Always confirm against the official judgment.

Explained · 1Cited · 1

Cited — Nadia Zaman v London Borough Of Waltham Forest 2023-03-24
“…We invited counsel to comment on the relevance, if any, of R v Soneji [2005] UKHL 49, [2006] 1 AC 340 (“Soneji”) and subsequent cases such as Natt v Osman [2014] EWCA Civ 1520, [2015] 1 WLR 1536 and Elim Court v Avon Freeholds [2017] EWCA Civ 8…”
Explained — Braithwaite and Melton Meadows Properties Limited, R (on the application of) v East Suffolk Council 2022-12-21
“…the subject of challenge in judicial review proceedings. The relevant legal principles were identified and explained in the speech of Lord Steyn in R. v Soneji [2005] UKHL 49; [2006] 1 A.C. 340 (in particular, at paragraphs 14 to 23) and by the High Court of Australia in Project Blue Sky Inc. v Australian Broadcasting Authority (199…”